JV
Apr 28, 2021
The readings were excellent, and readable 0 which is a plus for a course such as this.The 1 or zero peer-review rating was 'rough' and maybe 0 to 5 to differentiate effort and results in the e-tivity.
MA
Sep 12, 2019
It was a perfect course for understanding the research methods. It helps me a lot, thanks to the University of London and Coursera for providing this opportunity to enhance our Knowledge in research.
By stellamary
•Jan 24, 2017
good one
By Akpila R
•Jun 16, 2020
Helpful
By Dorji w
•Nov 12, 2024
great
By B I R
•Feb 21, 2025
Good
By P C .
•Jan 19, 2025
Good
By 2303C 5
•Oct 27, 2023
good
By Mohammed G
•Sep 4, 2023
good
By Ramisetti s k (
•Dec 24, 2021
Good
By Ghazi K
•Jul 8, 2021
good
By Harshad Y
•Apr 7, 2021
good
By Geo J D
•Mar 4, 2021
good
By Mahmoud M A m
•Feb 11, 2021
لطيف
By Happy A
•Nov 4, 2020
good
By Nivetha. G
•Aug 24, 2020
Good
By Ravindra J P
•Jul 22, 2020
Good
By Mostofa K
•Jul 18, 2020
Good
By Rehan N
•Jun 10, 2020
Good
By Ankit G
•May 27, 2020
nice
By Ismail O
•Nov 14, 2019
Good
By Dr. A K
•Oct 14, 2022
👍
By Erick C
•Apr 2, 2017
ok
By Phan T N ( D
•Jan 28, 2025
w
By Ujjawal D
•Jul 22, 2022
t
By Dr. V S
•Oct 4, 2021
O
By Emily W
•Nov 29, 2020
I wanted to give this course 5 stars because the content is really good, all the reading materials were incredibly useful and I enjoyed the videos and was able to take a lot from them. Unfortunately the forums aren't used as discussion forums - instead of any discussion about the materials there are just streams of requests for people to review submissions, which shouldn't be needed as the course is structured so that each time you make one submission you review three others, also because the e-tivities are only peer reviewed the quality and usefulness of the feedback is mostly not good, out of 4 submissions I have had 10 peer reviews so far and only one of them followed the advice to focus on what was good (but didn't give any suggestions for improvement) and the rest have either been single word responses (eg 'good' or 'fantastic'), despite the recommendation being at least 50 words, some had simply given information about tangentially related topics (a bunch of data about elementary school reading interventions, and a summary of some of the information from one of the other articles which I hadn't been responding to as the task clearly and in bold stated 'or'). This lack of meaningful interaction with anyone left me feeling disheartened and that I was working in a void. I think the moderators should be keeping the discussion forums on track, and that some feedback from the course teachers, even if only for the last submission would make a big difference. I didn't but the certificate because I didn't think that the assessment method for the course was rigourous enough to confer any value to having passed.