(256 Reviews)
(217 Reviews)
AH
Mar 3, 2016
Gah! The second last assignment...for items in data['comments'] :Took me an hour to figure out that I needed to add that last bit in brackets! It just did the for loop twice each time... All the best!
SM
Jun 18, 2020
This course was really interesting and did a good job introducing complicated topics in usefully simplified form. It was a pleasure to listen to the instructor and I got everything I wanted out of it.
By mahmoud K s
•Sep 8, 2020
good
By Sweta c
•Aug 23, 2020
good
By Aman R
•Aug 8, 2020
nice
By Sneha S
•Jul 25, 2020
nice
By Muhammad F H
•Jul 21, 2020
good
By rehan s
•Jul 18, 2020
good
By Sazida I N
•Jul 5, 2020
good
By Bodalapalle P S
•Jun 17, 2020
good
By Manali G
•Jun 1, 2020
good
By ABHISHEK C
•Apr 17, 2020
good
By VIGNESHKUMAR R
•Nov 20, 2019
good
By Deleted A
•Mar 4, 2019
Good
By Ankamreddi D
•May 26, 2018
good
By Putchakayala P
•May 26, 2018
good
By Akhilesh G
•Jun 21, 2017
Good
By Mohammad M H
•Dec 12, 2016
good
By 梁嘉琪
•Oct 14, 2016
Good
By 杨初斌
•Oct 8, 2016
good
By prakhar g r
•Apr 12, 2016
nice
By donganlan
•Dec 14, 2015
nice
By Michael H
•Nov 22, 2016
4/5
By Yao G
•Feb 18, 2019
y
By Steven R
•Mar 11, 2017
W
By Rosario A
•Mar 10, 2025
With all due respect, Prof. Severance teaches from the perspective of someone already well-versed in Python, rather than catering to students encountering it for the first time. He frequently uses terms like "blah, blah, blah" (I counted 16 times) and relies heavily on visual annotations—circles, squiggles, and “trees”—that make the provided notes difficult to follow on their own. Phrases like "this is this" and "that is that" appear in the notes, which lack clarity without additional context. I often found myself pausing the videos after nearly every sentence to take screenshots, turning a 10-minute lesson into an hour or more. I had to create my own reference system, noting things like "the purple squiggle means X" and "the yellow circle means Y" to make sense of his explanations. While I have no doubt that Prof. Severance is knowledgeable and a good instructor, the extra effort required to interpret the material was overwhelming. The first two courses I took—Programming for Everybody (Getting Started with Python) and Python Data Structures—were manageable. However, Using Python to Access Web Data became extremely frustrating. Ultimately, I decided not to continue the series, as the time and financial investment required to decipher the notes would be too much. I would challenge the professor to review his own notes without any visual reference to better understand the student experience.
By anas m r
•Jun 26, 2020
I really enjoyed the first two courses of Dr. Chuck's Python for Everybody Specialization -- but not this one. As some other reviewers have already stated I, too, felt increasingly frustrated and somehow left alone during this course. Most of this course's assignments were way too difficult and I had to search the web for hours to find some help to solve them. Or, quite honestly, I had to cheat my way through them, because I just didn't know what to do anymore. There are of course the discussion forums where one can state one's problem - but although the staff and mentors are really quick with replying (thumbs up for that), their tips are often way too general and not helpful at all.
After taking this third course I will definitely not continue with the Specialization, as I originally planned to, simply because in comparison to the first two courses, this third course is way too difficult and frustrating!
Also, in my opinion, Dr Chuck tries to squeeze in far too many different topics and different programming langauges into this course, instead of really just focusing on Python itself.
I completed this course, yes, but it left me with a very frustrated and unsatisfied feeling. I don't think I was really able to learn a lot from it, which is really a pity, since I enjoyed the first two courses so much.