The teacher helped shed the Myth that in depth knowledge Prompt engineering is essential, which I suspected all along. Although Prompt engineering is important after taking almost half a dozen courses, I realized that some material is repetitious. May be I needed guidance as to the optimal number of courses one should take for AI

If the measure of the excellence of the instructor is the total number of new neural nets in the student then this class deserves an Emmy! After taking this class I realized when talking to my 4 year old granddaughter that she is an LLM, and so am I. Excellent class!

Very relevant material, extremely capable and passionate professor. Highly recommended.

Great work, keep the courses coming...

Great introductory course!

.

This course would have been more useful if it had been more about hands-on practice. Ironically, it is the discussion about the state of AI that quickly becomes obsolete, while the actual techniques of Prompt Engineering carry over as models develop. I would have been much more satisfied if the course had consisted of a series of practical applications, eg, let's create some legal instruments and documents using progressively more sophisticated Prompt Engineering. The general discussion was a bit redundant and not very useful. The instructor seemed very competent. But this course requires competence in Law, AI, *and*pedagogy, which is a pretty heavy lift. I would have like a precise continuation of the pattern of Prompt Engineering for ChatGPT course, but digging down into Law specifically.

This was more of a refresher course on Vanderbilt's Prompt Engineering with AI Specialization than its own course. There wasn't much here that wasn't already covered by one of those courses. I was also hoping there would be more law-focused AI resources, but there weren't.

basics for HR and Laywers